0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½ºÆ®·¹½º Ãë¾à¼º ¹× ½ºÆ®·¹½º ´ëó ¸ðµ¨À» Àû¿ëÇÑ ÀӽŠÁß ¿ì¿ï °ü·Ã

Factors of Prenatal Depression by Stress-vulnerability and Stress-coping Models

¿©¼º°Ç°­°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 20±Ç 1È£ p.38 ~ 47
KMID : 0606420140200010038
±è¿µ¶õ ( Kim Young-Lan ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Á¤Àç¿ø ( Chung Chae-Weon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify related factors of prenatal depression by stress-vulnerability and stress-coping models for pregnant women.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design with a convenience sampling was used. A total of 107 pregnant women who visited a general hospital in a metropolitan city were recruited from August to October, 2013. A structured questionnaire included the Korean version of Beck Depression Inventory II, and the instruments measuring Self-Esteem, Marital Satisfaction, Pregnancy Stress, Stressful Life Events, and Coping. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, Parson¡¯s correlation analysis, and stepwise multiple regression.

Results: The mean score of prenatal depression was 11.95¡¾6.2, then showing 19.6% with mild depression, 15.0% with moderate depression, and 0.9% with severe depression on BDI II scale. Prenatal depression had positive correlation with pregnancy stress (r=.55, p<.01), stressful life events (r=.26, p<.01) and negative correlation with self-esteem (r=-.38, p<.01), marital satisfaction (r=-.40, p<.01), and coping (r=-.21, p<.05). Factors of pregnancy stress, self-esteem, stressful life events, and planned pregnancy explained 38% of the total variance of prenatal depression.

Conclusion: These findings show that health providers need to assess prenatal depression and to control the influencing factors.
KeyWords
¿ì¿ï, ÀӽźÎ, »êÀü °ü¸®
Depression, Pregnant women, Prenatal care
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed